|
|
A sampling of views on eye/organ/tissue donation & transplantation
from the world’s religions
The question often arises: “What does my religious tradition
believe about eye, organ, and tissue donation?”
This question commonly arises when people are asked to consider the
donation of their eyes, organs, and tissue or those of a loved one.
No one person or assembly of religious representatives can speak for
numerous religious groups. Therefore, it is difficult to state an
official position for some religious groups. However, research shows
that most religious groups do support eye, organ, and tissue
donation and transplantation, so long as it does not hasten or impede
the death of the donor. Researchalso reveals the underlying attitude
that unless the group has taken action to prohibit donation and
transplantation, it is usually assumed that such donation is permissible.
Each person is encouraged to research his or her religious group’s
position on donation and transplantation, as well as other biomedical ethical
issues. In addition, each clergy person or religious assembly should
keep abreast of any new resolutions or positions adopted at his or
her group’s national assembly. It is important to be informed because
the family member suddenly faced with making a decision concerning donation
of a loved one may be depending on the clergy or assembly to know the
position held by his or her Faith. Inability to make an informed
decision could leave a family member with a feeling of guilt, regardless of the
decision he or she may make.
PLEASE NOTE:
These summarizations are not intended to take the place of consultation with
clergy or independent investigation of one’s religious writings. Please use this
information as a starting point in the decision process.
Amish
| Discussion: |
The Amish will consent to transplantation if
they believe it is for the wellbeing of the transplant recipient. The Amish are reluctant, however, to
donate their organs if the transplant outcomes are questionable. The Amish generally believe that it is
God that created the human body and God that heals it. However, nothing in the Amish understanding of
the Bible forbids the use of modern medical services, including surgery, hospitalization, blood
transfusions, etc. |
Baha’i Faith
| Donation: |
Acceptable |
| Transplantation: |
Acceptable |
| Discussion: |
There is nothing in the Baha’i teachings that forbids
donation. A letter written on behalf of
Shoghi Effendi, the Guardian of the Baha’i Faith, states “There is nothing in
the teachings which would forbid a Baha’i to bequeath his eyes to another or
for a hospital; on the contrary it seems a noble thing to do.” In 1968, the Universal House of Justice, the
governing body of the world-wide Baha’i community, states that “We have not
come across anything specific in the writings on transplants of hearts and
other organs…and the Universal House of Justice does not wish to make any
statements on these points at this time.” In general, Baha’is are encouraged to seek the advice of skilled
physicians. Thus, at this point, the
decision regarding transplantation is the individual decision of each
Baha’i. Baha’is believe the spirit has
no more connection with the body after it departs, however, as the body was
once the temple of the spirit, Baha’is believe that it must be treated with
respect. There is no clergy in the
Baha’i Faith; therefore, a Local Spiritual Assembly may be consulted by an
individual (or by the family of the departed) for assistance in making a decision
regarding donation. |
Baptist
| Donation: |
Acceptable |
| Transplantation: |
Acceptable |
| Discussion: |
Donation is encouraged and supported as it is seen as an act of charity. The Church, however, leaves the decision to
donate up to the individual. The
nation’s largest Protestant denomination, the Southern Baptist Convention,
adopted a resolution in 1988 encouraging physicians to request organ donation
in appropriate circumstances and to “encourage volunteerism regarding organ
donations in the spirit of stewardship, compassion for the needs of others and
alleviating suffering.” Other Baptist
groups have supported eye, organ and tissue donation as an act of charity and
leave the decision to donate up to the individual. |
Brethren
| Discussion: |
While no official position has been taken by the Brethren
denominations, according to Pastor Mike Smith, there is a consensus
among the national Fellowship of Grace Brethren that donation is a charitable
act so long as it does not impede the life or hasten the death of the donor or
does not come from an unborn child. |
Buddhist Faith
| Donation: |
This is a matter of individual choice. |
| Transplantation: |
Buddhist teaching on the middle path, i.e. the avoiding of
extremes, may be applicable to these points. What is medicine
to one may be poison to another. Buddhist’s believe that donation is a matter of individual conscience
and place high value on acts of compassion. |
| Discussion: |
The importance of letting your loved ones know your wishes is
stressed. Many families will not give permission to donate unless they
know their loved ones wanted to be a donor. |
Catholic Faith
| Donation: |
Acceptable |
| Transplantation: |
Acceptable |
| Discussion: |
Catholics view eye, organ and tissue donation as an act of charity and love. Transplants
are morally and ethically acceptable to the Vatican. In 2000, Pope John Paul II
stated, “There is a need to instill in people’s hearts, especially in the
hearts of the young generation, a genuine and deep appreciation of the need for
brotherly love, a love that can find expression in the decision to become an
organ donor.” |
Christian Church (Disciples of Christ)
| Donation: |
Acceptable |
| Transplantation: |
Acceptable |
| Discussion: |
The Christian Church encourages eye, organ and tissue donation,
stating that we were created for God’s glory and for sharing God’s love. A 1985
resolution, adopted by the General
Assembly, encourages “…members of the Christian Church (Disciples of Christ) to
enroll as organ donors and prayerfully support those who have received an organ
transplant.” |
Christian Scientists
| Donation: |
Acceptable |
| Transplantation: |
Acceptable |
| Discussion: |
The Church of Christ Science does not have a specific position
regarding donation. According to the First Church if Christ Science in
Boston, Christian Scientists normally rely on
spiritual instead of medical means of healing. They are free, however, to choose whatever form of medical treatment
they desire, including transplant. The question of donation and transplantation is an individual decision. |
Episcopal
| Donation: |
Acceptable |
| Transplantation: |
Acceptable |
| Discussion: |
The Episcopal Church passed a resolution in 1982 that recognizes
the life-giving benefits of eye, organ, blood, and tissue donation. All
Christians are encouraged to become
donors “…as part of their ministry to others in the name of Christ, who gave
His life that we may live in its fullness.” |
Greek Orthodox
| Donation: |
Acceptable |
| Transplantation: |
Acceptable |
| Discussion: |
The Greek Orthodox Church has no objection, whether doctrinal or
moral, to the transplantation of organs used to better human life, i.e., for
transplantation or for research as long as the organs and tissue in question
will lead to improvements in the treatment and prevention of disease. The
reception and donation of organs for
this purpose reveal a profound act of loving solidarity and sacrifice among
human persons. |
Hindu Faith
| Donation: |
Acceptable |
| Transplantation: |
Acceptable |
| Discussion: |
According to the Hindu Temple Society of North America, religious
law does not prohibit Hindus from donating their organs. This act is an individual’s decision.
H.L. Trivedi, in Transplantation Proceedings, stated that, “Hindu mythology has stories in which the parts of
the human body are used for the benefit of other human beings and society. There is nothing in the Hindu religion
indicating that parts of humans, dead or alive, cannot be used to alleviate the
suffering of other humans.” |
Independent Conservative Evangelical
| Donation: |
Acceptable |
| Transplantation: |
Acceptable |
| Discussion: |
Generally, Evangelicals have no opposition to donation. Each church is autonomous and leaves the decision to donate up to the individual. |
Islam
| Donation: |
Acceptable |
| Transplantation: |
Acceptable |
| Discussion: |
The religion of Islam believes in the principle of saving human
life. According to A. Sachedina in his
Transplantation Proceedings article (1990), Islamic Views on Organ
Transplantation, “…the majority of the Muslim scholars belonging to various
schools of Islamic law have invoked the principle of priority of saving lives
and have permitted the organ transplant as a necessity to procure that noble
end.” |
Jehovah’s Witness
| Donation: |
Acceptable |
| Transplantation: |
Acceptable |
| Discussion: |
According to the Watch Tower Society, the legal corporation for the religion,
Jehovah’s Witnesses believe donation is a matter of individual decision. They are
often assumed to be opposed to donation because of their belief against blood
transfusion. However, this only means that all blood must be removed from the
organs and tissue before being transplanted. |
Jewish Faith
| Donation: |
Acceptable |
| Transplantation: |
Acceptable |
| Discussion: |
All four branches of the Jewish Faith (Orthodox, Conservative,
Reform, and Reconstructionist) support and encourage donation. According to Orthodox Rabbi Moses Tendler,
Chairman of the Biology Dept. of Yeshiva University in New York and Chairman of
the Bioethics Commission of the Rabbinical Council of America, “If one is in
the position to donated an organ and to save another’s life it’s obligatory to
do so, even if the donor never knows who the beneficiary will be. The basic principles of Jewish ethics-‘the
infinite worth of the human being’- also indicates donation of corneas, since
eyesight restoration is considered a life-saving operation.” In 1991, the Rabbinical Council of America
(Orthodox) approved organ donations as permissible, and even required, from
brain-dead patients. The Reform
movement looks upon the transplant program favorably and Rabbi Richard Address,
Director of the Union of American Hebrew Congregations Bio-Ethics Committee and
Committee on Older Adults, states that “Judaic Responsa materials provide a
positive approach and by and large the North American Reform Jewish Community
approves of transplantation.” Given the
complicated issue and the number of factors that need to be taken into account,
it would always be advisable for the parties involved to speak to their Rabbi
if circumstances permit. |
Lutheran
| Donation: |
Acceptable |
| Transplantation: |
Acceptable |
| Discussion: |
The Lutheran Church does not oppose donation and believes that
the decision to donate one’s eyes, organs and/or tissue should be left up to
the individual. In 1984, the Lutheran
Church of America passed a resolution stating that donation contributes to the
wellbeing of humanity and can be “…an expression of sacrificial love for a
neighbor in need.” The Church calls on
its members to consider donating organs and t0 make necessary family and legal
arrangements, including the use of a signed donor card. |
Mennonite
| Donation: |
Acceptable |
| Transplantation: |
Acceptable |
| Discussion: |
Mennonites have no formal position on donation, but are not
opposed to it. They believe the
decision to donate is up to the individual and/or the family. |
Moravian
| Donation: |
Acceptable |
| Transplantation: |
Acceptable |
| Discussion: |
The Moravian Church has made no formal statement addressing eye,
organ, and tissue donation or transplantation. Robert E. Sawyer, President, Provincial Elders Conference, Moravian
Church of America, southern Province, states, “There is nothing in our doctrine
or policy that would prevent a Moravian pastor from assisting a family in
making a decision to donate or not to donate an organ.” It is, therefore, a matter of individual
choice. |
Mormon Church (Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints)
| Donation: |
Acceptable |
| Transplantation: |
Acceptable |
| Discussion: |
The Church made the following policy statement on June 3, 1974:
“The question of whether one should will bodily organs to be used as
transplants or for research after death must be answered from deep within the
conscience of the individual involved. Those who seek counsel from the church on this subject are encouraged to
review the advantages and disadvantages of doing so, to implore the Lord for
inspiration and guidance, and then to take the course of action which should
give a feeling of peace and comfort.” |
Pentecostal:
| Donation: |
Acceptable |
| Transplantation: |
Acceptable |
| Discussion: |
Pentecostals believe that the decision to
donate one’s eyes, organs and tissue should be left up to the individual. |
Presbyterian
| Donation: |
Acceptable |
| Transplantation: |
Acceptable |
| Discussion: |
Presbyterians encourage and support donation. They respect a person’s right to make
decisions regarding their own body. |
Seventh-Day Adventists
| Donation: |
Acceptable |
| Transplantation: |
Acceptable |
| Discussion: |
Although transplant procedures are carried out at many Seventh
Day Adventist institutions around the world, the church has made no formal
declaration regarding organ donation and transplantation. They have many transplant hospitals,
including Loma Linda, in California. Loma Linda specializes in pediatric heart transplantation. |
Shinto
| Donation: |
Not acceptable |
| Transplantation: |
Acceptable to some |
| Discussion: |
In Shinto, the dead body is considered to be impure and dangerous,
and thus quite powerful. “In folk belief context, injuring a dead body is a serious crime…” according to E.
Namihra in his article, “Shinto Concept Concerning the Dead Human Body.” “To this day it is difficult to obtain
consent from bereaved families for organ donation…the Japanese regard it in the
sense of injuring a dead body.” Families are often concerned that they not injure the itia ~ the
relationship between the dead person and the bereaved people. |
Society of Friends (Quakers)
| Donation: |
Acceptable |
| Transplantation: |
Acceptable |
| Discussion: |
Donation is believed to be an individual decision. The Society of Friends does not have an
official position on donation. |
Unitarian Universalists
| Donation: |
Acceptable |
| Transplantation: |
Acceptable |
| Discussion: |
When the patient and physicians believe that such operations will
be beneficial to the patient and when the donor is not harmed, Unitarian
Universalists support donation. It is viewed as an act of love and selfless giving. |
United Church of Christ
| Donation: |
Acceptable |
| Transplantation: |
Acceptable |
| Discussion: |
Reverend Jay Lintner, Director, Washington Office of the United
Church of Christ Office for Church in Society, states: “United Church of Christ
people, churches, and agencies are extremely and overwhelmingly supportive of
organ sharing. The General Synod has
never spoken to this issue because, in general, the Synod speaks on more
controversial issues, and there is no controversy about organ sharing, just as
there is no controversy about blood donation in the denomination. While the General Synod has never spoken
about blood donation, blood donation rooms have been set up at several General
Synods. Similarly, any organized effort
to get the General Synod delegates or individuals to sign organ donation cards
would meet with generally positive responses.” |
United Methodist
| Donation: |
Acceptable |
| Transplantation: |
Acceptable |
| Discussion: |
The United Methodist Church issued a policy statement regarding
eye, organ, and tissue donation. In it,
they state that: “The United Methodist Church recognizes the life-giving
benefits of organ and tissue donation, and thereby encourages all Christians to
become organ and tissue donors by signing and carrying cards or driver’s
licenses, attesting to their commitment of such organs upon their death, to
those in need, as part of their ministry to others in the name of Christ, who
gave His life that we may live in its fullness.” A 1992 resolution states, “Donation is to be encouraged, assuming
appropriate safeguards against hastening death and determination of death by
reliable criteria.” The resolution
further states, “Pastoral care persons should be willing to explore these
options as a normal part of conversation with patients and their families.” |
|